On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Albert Nelms <alnelms
Another quick rundown of global warming lies. You've mentioned most of these issues in your debates with friends online.
1. There is a long term consequence of raising the temperature 5 degrees celsius or more that is very bad, which is that the polar ice caps will completely melt. Based on current temperature trends, I don't think that this is likely to happen, and if it does happen, it will take 5000 years, giving us plenty of time to do something about it.
2. The direct effect of doubling CO2 in the atmosphere is an increase of 1.1 degrees celsius. Almost everybody agrees on this. There are a couple of dissenters who say that over geological periods of time you can't find a clear correlation, but there is so much else going on over geological periods, usually solar and orbital variation, that confuses the issue.
There are additional positive and negative feedbacks that are in dispute. Whereas the direct effect is 1.1 degrees celsius, the data since 1880 indicates to me that the Climate sensitivity is slightly under 2 degrees. That means that there is positive feedback, although solar variation could also be the cause. It also means that the climate sensitivity is less than the alarmists are claiming. I heard one lecturer say that the positive feedback was "0.6", which seems to me to be close.
Until about a week ago, I didn't see any evidence of positive feedback, but that was because I had miscalculated the Climate Sensitivity.
#3 and #4 are interesting points.
#12 He doesn't explain his point about acidity very well.
Warming does cause the oceans to release more CO2. There is also very little doubt that CO2 causes warming. The real issue is how much? The warming caused by CO2 is a logarithmic function, which means that you have to keep doubling the CO2 level to achieve the same result. Based on current temperature trends, we will run out of fossil fuels long before we reach an increase of 5 degrees celsius.