I agree with Ben Shapiro that Iran violated the Memorandum of Understanding shortly after it was signed. That does not necessarily mean the agreement itself was bad, but it does mean Iran failed to comply with its commitments. I also agree with Shapiro's view that a more aggressive approach toward Iran would have been preferable.
Shapiro assumes that Trump's motivations are solely economic and political. This feels like a straw-man argument. I think Trump is smarter than that and would prefer to avoid unnecessary bloodshed.
I have a problem with J.D. Vance, who is more of an isolationist and sometimes makes statements that seem less than truthful. He could become president in the distant future, or circumstances could make him president much sooner. However, he may not be the right person for the job.
Everyone is questioning the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding, but the United States, as the more powerful country, holds most of the cards. It can impose whatever terms it wants on Iran.
No comments:
Post a Comment