Thursday, August 16, 2018
Tuesday, August 14, 2018
My concern is that student protests everywhere have become more violent. I get a sense that people are descending into chaos. There is pent up rage, much of which is out of proportion to reality.
Saturday, August 11, 2018
He goes on to say nasty things about the political right, so response I wrote this ...
"Straw mans all over the place. If your perception of the right is a bunch of racist, tribalist conspiracy theory loving authoritarians wanting strong men then you don't really understand the political right.
Socialist and left policies are authoritarian to the core. It is the political right that loves freedom and free enterprise.
Has society collapsed yet?
It is not racist to want to protect our border. It is not racist to say that criminals are coming into our country and committing crimes; this is easily provable. Nor did Trump call all Mexicans this. The left plays the race card every chance they get. Anybody they don't like they call a racist as a way of shutting down the argument. This infuriates me to no end. When Trump and anyone else they don't like speaks, the left is guilty of confirmation bias. Any statement he makes is taken as a confirmation of his evilness.
It is the Republicans who begged Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell to run for President. The Tea Party's and my favorite candidate was Herman Cain.
What you see on Social Media doesn't necessarily represent the political right. It might for some people, but it is not represent the core beliefs.
I love science and I love your channel for talking about it.
If you were more rational you would understand that freedom is the engine of prosperity and that Socialism has always failed hurting the poor the most. Maybe you already understand this, but why then support the political left which has become more extremist? We are headed toward a debt bubble that could potentially crash our economic system, and the only way to get out of this huge mess (admittedly created by both parties) is to have strong economic growth. I take it as a given that we need less burdensome government and a better tax system, both of which we got.
I know that many people didn't like Trump. Even many of us who voted for him thought that he was a narcissistic billionaire playboy. Believe me, people understood this. I didn't so much vote for the man as I did his agenda, which I mostly agree with. Given the stated goals of both candidates, one of which wanted to increase government's reach and sounded more like a warmonger than Trump did, it was a no brainer."
Friday, August 10, 2018
Sunday, August 5, 2018
Saturday, August 4, 2018
Friday, August 3, 2018
Wednesday, August 1, 2018
Tuesday, July 31, 2018
Sunday, July 29, 2018
Friday, July 27, 2018
Wednesday, July 25, 2018
Tuesday, July 24, 2018
Sunday, July 22, 2018
From: John Coffey <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: Korea
To: Albert Nelms
I am going to address several
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Albert Nelms <email@example.com> wrote:
> We need to have minimum wage keep up with inflation. However, any politician suggesting such a thing would be run out on rails.
I don't see why this is politically impossible. Any party that suggests an increase in the minimum wage, perhaps moderate, would likely get votes.
This makes certain assumptions. What business is it of the state to say what kind of wage people agree to work for? If I choose to work someplace for $5 an hour, it is because I can't get anything better. Maybe my circumstances are so bad that nobody will hire me at minimum wage. It is like the application at Taco Bell that says, "What drugs have you done?", as to opposed to asking if you have done drugs
The purpose of minimum wage is not to provide a living wage. It is for unskilled workers who might in time develop skills and be worth more. It is intended for entry level jobs.
In reality, many places pay more than minimum wage. People at Burger King told me that
> There was a time when a person could graduate from high school and get a job in which he was able to support his family and eventually enter middle class.
That time seems to have passed
If a person can not make enough to support a family, then they shouldn't start a family. Should there be a safety net for people who otherwise would not survive on low wages? I think so. We might need more of this if automation takes away jobs
> Today, college degrees are tied into student loans which in turn ties the graduate down to long term debt right off the bat. So, if the college grad has student loans he may never get to middle class. Now with internet degrees diluting the on campus degrees salaries for college graduates are dropping.with a few exceptions like doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc.
The problem is that the government is spending over $200 Billion a year on higher education. When you subsidize something, you get more of it, whether you need it or not. When 40% of
> The solution? Good question. There was a time when Americans who bought goods from say Japan or Germany were considered traitorous.
I think that international trade is vastly misunderstood. When you buy something from Japan ...
1. You do so because they can make it cheaper or better than the equivalent thing made in America. In economics they talk about comparative advantage, where you might be really good at doing one thing, which is highly profitable for you, so you would rather somebody else do the thing that is less profitable for you.
2. The dollars you send to Japan are no good to them unless they can exchange them for yen or buy our goods, and the currency exchange market only works if goods are going both ways.
Friday, July 20, 2018
Saturday, July 14, 2018
Friday, July 13, 2018
Thursday, July 12, 2018
Friday, July 6, 2018
Thursday, July 5, 2018
Sunday, July 1, 2018
Not a minute too soon. The stealing is getting worse. Politicians naively said admitting China to the World Trade Organization in 2001 would push it toward a free market economy observing the rule of law. Magical thinking.
From the start, China violated WTO rules, knocking off American products and selling them as the real deal. A staggering 88 percent of counterfeit goods seized are from China and Hong Kong, according to Homeland Security. It's like the Chinese thought "free market" meant steal what you want.
Steal it or extort it. American companies doing business in China are pressured to transfer proprietary technology to a local partner. China promised to stop that arm-twisting but broke its word.
Now China is abandoning any pretense of respecting intellectual property. President Xi Jinping's official economic policy, called Made in China 2025, elevates technology theft to official status. The government politely calls it "the assimilation and absorption of imported technology." China plans to steal its way to economic dominance and end dependence on foreign suppliers.
American companies can't thrive under this threat. Our advantage in world markets isn't cheap labor or cheap materials. It's ideas
American Superconductor Corporation was almost put out of business, its stock value driven down 96 percent, when a Chinese wind turbine maker stole its technology and flooded the Chinese market with copies.
But if Beijing's plan proceeds, these U.S. companies will be shut out of China in a decade, and will have to compete in the rest of the world against Chinese companies that stole their technology and enjoy low-cost financing from Chinese state banks
And there is clearly an adamant, persistent segment of the public that sees the crisis of illegal immigration as a vital one. They're not alone. Cast an eye at Brexit Britain, newly populist Italy, Macron's France, and even Merkel's Germany as it heaves in response to mass immigration from the developing world. This is a huge force in Western politics in every country. It may be the primary one. Millions of people are on the move right now, fleeing war and poverty and persecution. The vast migration from south to north, from poverty and chaos to opportunity and order in the West may be just beginning. Climate change will surely only make it worse. Finding the right balance between reason and compassion is essential if we are not going to further tear this country apart, or witness ever more humanitarian catastrophes, or see what's left of the West go under
So give him his fucking wall. He won the election. He is owed this. It may never be completed; it may not work, as hoped. But it is now the only way to reassure a critical mass of Americans that mass immigration is under control, and the only way to make any progress under this president. And until the white working and middle classes are reassured, we will get nowhere. Don't give it to him for nothing, of course
If all this sounds like appeasing a bigot, I understand. But better to see it, I think, as a way to address the legitimate concerns, fears, and worries of a large number of Americans who feel like strangers in their own land.
And equally, the Democrats who are currently posturing are playing a good card badly. They give off the appearance, as Hillary Clinton did, of making no distinction between legal and illegal immigration, favoring de facto open borders, and calling anyone who disagrees with them a white supremacist. Until they recognize that illegal immigration is a huge and legitimate problem, and until they propose a set of actual policy proposals to end it humanely and efficiently, they run the risk of another 2016 in 2020.
And this is what Miller and Bannon want. They want to turn the fall elections and the next presidential contest into a polarizing, fearmongering referendum on illegal immigration