Politics
Sunday, January 17, 2021
Friday, January 15, 2021
Is Trump Guilty of Inciting an Insurrection? | "mens rea" & Impeachment
Thursday, January 14, 2021
IMPEACH THIS! Dinesh D’Souza Podcast Ep.4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBWoA_ukFl0
Don Lemon: Everyone Who Voted For Trump Sided With ‘The Klan,’ ‘Nazis,’ Rioters
Wednesday, January 13, 2021
Fwd: The two trump tweets that caused Trump's ban
Twitter's explanation for permanently suspending Trump from its platform is laughable. In a blog post, the company argued that two tweets from the president occasioned the move:
From January 8, 2021:
"The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me, AMERICA FIRST, and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future. They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!"
A short while later:
"To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th."
...
We also know that Twitter's attack on Trump is not about preventing violence because the firm's partisan bias showed up way before the storming of the Capitol. It was evident last summer, when the social media giant prevented the dissemination of credible reporting from the New York Post about Hunter Biden's shady business deals in Ukraine and China.
Imagine: A supposedly neutral platform forbids circulation of revelations that a presidential candidate likely knew about and perhaps was involved in his son's attempts to trade on his father's former position in the White House.
Despite denials from the same journalists who submerged the country in Russia-gate hysteria for over two years, the Hunter Biden story was real. It was backed up by communications from Hunter Biden himself and by first-hand accounts from people involved. Notably, it was never denied by either Joe or Hunter Biden.
Twitter's bias against conservatives is evident, as well, from the smooth glide of company officials onto President-elect Joe Biden's transition team and now his administration. Twitter's public policy director, Carlos Monje, who hosted a fundraiser for Biden, joined in September. More recently, former Twitter employee Emily Horne signed up to lead communications for Biden's National Security Council. She joins dozens of other Silicon Valley refugees, all eager to help craft Biden's left-leaning agenda.
Let's not forget the ultimate fingerprints of bias: campaign donations. According to Open Secrets, Twitter employees donated nearly $1 million to Biden's campaign and to other Democrats; not one dollar flowed to Trump or any other Republican.
Twitter trashes conservatives as @Jack gloats — this won't end well for Twitter | TheHill
A Closer Look at What Happened Last Week
From: Larry Trout <>
Date: Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 1:00 PM
Subject: Ron Paul
To:
Tuesday, January 12, 2021
Response to: Facebook Locks Out Ron Paul Following Column Criticizing Big Tech Censorship
- Like
- · Reply
- · 10h
- When organizations are so powerful that they can diminish the free speech of the people they disagree with, but most importantly the President of the United States, then those organizations are too powerful. They have too much of a monopoly. Current laws protect these organizations. We could change the laws.1
- Like
- · Reply
- · 10h
- · Edited
- This issue has nothing to do with the freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is solely in reference to the US government. The government cannot restrict one's speech. A company has the right to allow or disallow anyone access to their platform at their discretion. It is their platform. They are not required to allow anyone on to say anything they want.The 1st Amendment of the U.S. ConstitutionThe 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
- Like
- · Reply
- · 9h
- Duke does have a point
- Like
- · Reply
- · 8h
- This is the kind of crap that the left gives as a knee jerk reaction without thinking about it too deeply. Social media has become the town square. Without it, you are really limited on getting your message out. This is about monopolies and companies becoming too powerful, which is a common complaint by the left. Current law says that these companies are platforms and not publishers, protecting them from what people post on their sites. But they are acting as publishers engaging in censorship. When they act in unison to ban conservative voices then this creates a situation that is beyond unfair. And it takes extreme arrogance to ban the President of the United States. Meanwhile, they don't ban dictators from around the world.Before the election, the social media companies were blocking posts about the Hunter Biden laptop story. Around 45% of Biden voters said that they didn't know about it. One in six said that they would have changed their minds had they known about it.Twitter said that if you don't like their policies then start your own social media service. Well, people did and it was called Parler, but the major tech companies just removed it from their app stores and canceled their web hosting.This has created a situation that is simply intolerable. It is so biased against conservative voices that it has become an oligopoly. The Cancel Culture has been trying to shut people up, even online.We regulate all forms of media. The Internet was created by the U.S. government, originally for the military, and was opened up to commercial use around 1993. The Internet exists because of the government and it is a public platform.
Monday, January 11, 2021
It's time for a divorce...
Sunday, January 10, 2021
The Ten Rules That Explain What The Radical Left Is Planning
Exclusive: More Than 432,000 Votes Removed From Trump in Pennsylvania, Data Scientists Say
Saturday, January 9, 2021
Chinese Military Bases in Jamaica and the Caribbean
This is my response...
I can find no evidence that China is building military bases in the Bahamas or Jamaica. China did offer aid and loans to countries ravaged by hurricanes. China appears to be increasing its influence in the area, as they have done throughout the world.
I see much speculation on the Internet about Chinese military bases in the Caribbean, but nothing more than that. Our country most likely would not stand for it.
China has been investing in the US for a long time. This is because of the trade deficit, so they take their excess dollars and buy businesses in the US.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/611020/total-number-of-properties-purchased-by-chinese-buyers-in-the-us/
https://havokjournal.com/politics/international/china-pwns-us-how-the-chinese-are-buying-up-america/
https://thecounter.org/foreign-owned-farmland-increase-food-security-legislation/