From: l.robert.updike@
Date: September 13, 2010 9:50:58 AM MDT
To: "Trout, Larry R @ CSW-SLC" <larry.r.trout@
Subject: RE: Krugman attacks China
Simple solution.Tell the PRC that we will make up any trade deficit with them by selling additional arms to the ROC.-----Original Message-----From: Trout, Larry CSW-SLCSubject: Krugman attacks China I didn't expect to see this from Krugman...'You see, senior American policy figures have repeatedly balked at doinganything about Chinese currency manipulation, at least in part out of fear that the Chinese would stop buying our bonds. Yet in the currentenvironment, Chinese purchases of our bonds don't help us - they hurtus. The Japanese understand that. Why don't we? Some background: If discussion of Chinese currency policy seemsconfusing, it's only because many people don't want to face up to thestark, simple reality - namely, that China is deliberately keeping its currency artificially weak. The consequences of this policy are also stark and simple: in effect,China is taxing imports while subsidizing exports, feeding a huge trade surplus. You may see claims that China's trade surplus has nothing to dowith its currency policy; if so, that would be a first in world economichistory. An undervalued currency always promotes trade surpluses, and China is no different. And in a depressed world economy, any country running an artificialtrade surplus is depriving other nations of much-needed sales and jobs. Again, anyone who asserts otherwise is claiming that China is somehowexempt from the economic logic that has always applied to everyoneelse.'http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/opinion/13krugman.html_r=2&ref=global
No comments:
Post a Comment