FYI.
________________________________________
From: John Coffey <john2001plus@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2020 4:32 AM
Subject: What Really Happened In That Friday Meeting With President Trump Last Week
Somebody brought this meeting up to me. Reportedly it was pretty heated.
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 10:34 AM al <algrotz> wrote:
Patrick Byrne is a millionaire that has been funding investigations into the voter fraud. He is the same guy you saw earlier in another video who was part of the sting operation on Hillary Clinton when she accepted an $18 million bribe. This video has a lot of valuable information. It is 2 hours long, I only listened to the first 1 hour. But at least listen to the first 20 minutes. This is a man telling you first hand what happened in the White House, he was there (he says "I almost stood up and decked the guy.")
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: John Coffey <john2001plus@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 9:28 PM
Subject: Patrick Byrne clams about What Really Happened In That Friday Meeting With President Trump Last Week
To: al <algrotz>
From: John Coffey <john2001plus@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 9:28 PM
Subject: Patrick Byrne clams about What Really Happened In That Friday Meeting With President Trump Last Week
To: al <algrotz>
There is a lack of detail except to say that martial law was not suggested as reported and somebody was rude to the President. He says that Sidney Powell was appointed special counsel which seems highly unlikely given that there has been no news to that effect and the administration has been trying to distance itself from her. This is contradicted by some news articles.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-block-sidney-powell-white-house-special-counsel-report-2020-12
Here is an interesting take: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/19/sidney-powell-trump-special-counsel-448694
So far, most of what I have seen from all sources is speculation. The only convincing thing has been the sworn testimony of witnesses claiming fraud.
The video claims that the election was stolen, but the more I look at this, the less likely it seems that this is the case. We seem to be long past the point where the lawsuits will have any effect. I have no doubt that there was some election fraud, as there seems to be some evidence to that effect, but the evidence hasn't been hard enough to win in court. So far the court cases have been a complete failure.
Various people keep claiming to have the goods, but it never seems to come to fruition. For some websites and publications, there is money to be made by stringing people along. They keep telling people what they want to hear to generate internet traffic.
The website is cited by many sources as a fake news site that promotes conspiracy theories. The site allows user-submitted news stories.
So, therefore, I predict that the claims made in the video will come to nothing. This has been the trend so far.
--
No comments:
Post a Comment