Tuesday, December 31, 2024
Monday, December 30, 2024
Where are the safest small cities in America?
In 2024, MoneyGeek analyzed the crime statistics and cost of crimes in cities with 30,000-100,000 residents.
Up first on its list, as the safest small city in the country, is Columbus, which is about 40 miles south of Indianapolis. According to the MoneyGeek, the town has the smallest crime cost per capita
Sunday, December 29, 2024
Tuesday, December 24, 2024
Pat Boone - "Where Did America Go?" (Official Music Video)
The state GOP is now sending a robo-call throughout the state featuring none other than Pat Boone, warning that as a Christian he is concerned that Democratic nominee Steve Beshear, who has been way ahead in the polls, will work for "every homosexual cause."
"Now do you want a governor who'd like Kentucky to be another San Francisco?" Boone asks. "Please re-elect Ernie Fletcher."'
And at a campaign stop last night, the Lexington Herald-Leader reports, the Republican nominee for Lt. Governor made a direct attack upon the Democratic ticket: "Do you want a couple of San Francisco treats or do you want a governor?"
Monday, December 23, 2024
Sunday, December 22, 2024
Saturday, December 21, 2024
What They Didn’t Want You to Know About Derek Chauvin's Case
According to Wikipedia and other sources, George Floyd's heart stopped en route to the hospital. Most sources say Floyd had a pulse detected by a paramedic before being loaded into the ambulance, although another source disputes that.
Floyd was pronounced dead in the Emergency Room. It is not true that he was alive in the hospital, although that might be a matter of definition. Paramedics tried to resuscitate Floyd for at least 30 minutes. One source says an hour.
So the video contains false information, making it a conspiracy theory. He states that the prosecutor and medical examiner lied and falsified records.
However, he may still have valid points. The trial is suspect and took place in a politically charged environment. I think that the cause of death is not clear. George Floyd had cardiovascular disease, a heart tumor, an active case of COVID-19, a lifetime of drug abuse, and a dangerous level of drugs in his system.
There is no evidence that Derek Chauvin intended to harm George Floyd. This makes the murder conviction unjust. At most Derek Chauvin is guilty of involuntary (or negligent) homicide. He was negligent, but these guys have difficult jobs. Chauvin was a police officer trying to do his job, however improperly.
Convicting the other police officers who were doing crowd control also seems unjust. At least one of these guys was a trainee who would likely be inexperienced and took direction from his superiors.
https://san.com/cc/judge-rules-chauvins-defense-may-examine-george-floyds-autopsy/
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/o-t-lounge/george-floyd-was-alive-when-he-arrived-at-the-hospital/116735751/
https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/14/us/derek-chauvin-trial-george-floyd-day-13/index.html
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/lung-expert-testifies-george-floyd-died-because-his-breathing-was-restricted
https://www.npr.org/sections/trial-over-killing-of-george-floyd/2021/04/08/985347984/chauvin-trial-medical-expert-says-george-floyd-died-from-a-lack-of-oxygen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oqEp63duIc
"Two autopsies, and one autopsy review, found Floyd's death to be a homicide.[26][27]
On March 12, 2021, Minneapolis agreed to pay US$27 million to settle a wrongful death lawsuit brought by Floyd's family. On April 20, Chauvin was convicted of unintentional second-degree murder, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter,[4][28] and on June 25 he was sentenced to 22+1⁄2 years in prison.[29]
All four officers faced federal civil rights charges.[30] In December 2021, Chauvin pleaded guilty to federal charges of violating Floyd's civil rights by using unreasonable force and ignoring his serious medical distress.[31][32] The other three officers were also later convicted of violating Floyd's civil rights.[33] Lane pleaded guilty in May 2022 to a state charge of aiding and abetting second-degree manslaughter[34] and was sentenced on September 21, 2022, to three years in prison to be served concurrently with his federal sentence of 2+1⁄2 years.[35] Kueng pleaded guilty on October 24, 2022, to the state charges of aiding and abetting manslaughter and was sentenced to 3+1⁄2 years in prison, to be served concurrently with his federal sentence.[36][37] Thao waived his right to a jury trial on the state charge in lieu of a review of the evidence and a determination by a judge.[38] He was found guilty of aiding and abetting manslaughter in a written verdict delivered on May 2, 2023, and he was sentenced to 4+3⁄4 years in prison.[7][13]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_George_Floyd
I don't see any of this being overturned, although I would like to see Chauvin get some leniency.
Friday, December 20, 2024
Floyd autopsy altered by political pressure
"I called Dr. Baker early that morning to tell him about the case and to ask him if he would perform the autopsy on Mr. Floyd," said Sweasy under oath. "He called me later in the day on that Tuesday and he told me that there were no medical findings that showed any injury to the vital structures of Mr. Floyd's neck. There were no medical indications of asphyxia or strangulation," Sweasy added.
By day two, Baker knew the risks involved in telling the truth. Sweasy continued, "He said to me, 'Amy, what happens when the actual evidence doesn't match up with the public narrative that everyone's already decided on?' And then he said, 'This is the kind of case that ends careers.'" Although Sweasy knows very well why Baker altered his diagnosis, Carlson may not. This story bears retelling in the light of Sweasy's unwitting confirmation.
As I reported on these pages in August 2021, an exhibit surfaced in the case of Chauvin colleague Tou Thao that should have resulted in a new trial for Chauvin and the release of Thao and the other two arrested officers, Thomas Lane and Alexander Kueng.
The exhibit, a memorandum, was that powerful. It memorialized a November 2020 conference between Dr. Roger Mitchell, former Washington D.C. chief medical examiner, and several prosecutors. Sweasy was not among the prosecutors present. Nor was Freeman. All but one were from the attorney general's office.
This should not surprise. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, whose affiliation with the Nation of Islam cost him a shot at becoming DNC Chair, kept a heavy hand on the case. "The AG taking over the Chauvin cases was difficult," said Senior Assistant County Attorney Judith Cole in her deposition in the Sweasy suit, "particularly when we had a governor who kind of threw us under the bus."
The memorandum detailed Mitchell's effort to coerce Baker into including neck compression in his diagnosis of Floyd's death. As noted above, Baker conducted an autopsy on Floyd on May 26, 2020, the day after Floyd's death. Baker reported that same day to the Hennepin County prosecutors, "The autopsy revealed no physical evidence suggesting that Mr. Floyd died of asphyxiation. Mr. Floyd did not exhibit signs of petechiae, damage to his airways or thyroid, brain bleeding, bone injuries, or internal bruising."
Three days later — Friday, May 29 — the state filed its initial complaint against Derek Chauvin. According to the complaint, "The full report of the [medical examiner] is pending but the [medical examiner] has made the following preliminary findings. The autopsy revealed no physical findings that support a diagnosis of traumatic asphyxia or strangulation." Without a diagnosis of asphyxia, however, the state could not accuse Chauvin and the police officers of committing or abetting "Murder-2nd Degree." This is where Mitchell came into play.
A well-connected black political activist, Mitchell boasted of his involvement in Baker's diagnosis to the attorneys present. Their summary of that interaction reads in part:
When the preliminary result came out via the criminal complaint, Mitchell found the statement was bizarre. Mitchell was reading and said this is not right. So Mitchell called Baker and said first of all Baker should fire his public information officer. Then Mitchell asked what happened, because Mitchell didn't think it sounded like Baker's words. Baker said that he didn't think the neck compression played a part and that he didn't find petechiae. Mitchell said but you know you can not have petechiae and still have asphyxia and can still have neck compression.
Mitchell first called Baker on Friday, May 29. He "thought about it more that weekend" and on Monday he called Baker telling him he was about to send an op-ed to the Washington Post critical of Baker's findings. "In this conversation," the memorandum continued, "Mitchell said, you don't want to be the medical examiner who tells everyone they didn't see what they saw. You don't want to be the smartest person in the room and be wrong."
By that Monday cities across America had gone up in flames, none more ferociously than Minneapolis. The ever thoughtful Mitchell showed Baker a way out of the jam. According to the memorandum, "[Mitchell] said there was a way to articulate the cause and manner of death that ensures you are telling the truth about what you are observing on the body and via all of the investigation. Mitchell said neck compression has to be in the diagnosis."
Late on that same Monday, Baker's office sent out a press release that began, "Cause of death: Cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression." (Italics added). With a stroke of the pen and the complicity of the prosecutors, Baker turned four innocent cops into murderers and justified the self-destructive social revolution that followed.
"There was extreme premium pressure, yes. The city was burning down," Sweasy's former colleague Patrick Lofton said in his deposition. He and Sweasy withdrew from the cases against Lane, Kueng, and Thao on June 3, 2020, just a week after Floyd's death. They did not believe the three officers should be criminally charged. "I can tell you that everyone that I associate with to any degree, professionally or personally, agreed with our decision," Lofton testified. He described the pressure on the prosecutors as "insane."
Lofton wrote his letter of withdrawal, he said, "because I have to sleep at night." He and Sweasy might have slept better had they gone public with what they knew, namely that Chauvin and his colleagues were being tried for a crime they did not commit.
How did Floyd die? I asked my consultant on this case, John Dale Dunn, a veteran emergency physician and lawyer with expertise in matters of cause of death. Dunn is in a position to know. He wrote a chapter on forensic evidence for the American College of Legal Medicine. "Derrick Chauvin didn't kill Mr. Floyd," he told me. "His bad heart did." (READ More: The Semantic Burden of Speaking While White)
Dunn believes that Baker did an "assiduous and thorough autopsy." His findings, he argues, "did exonerate the police officers — there was no evidence of asphyxiation or strangulation, not any evidence of damage or compromise of the airway of breathing of Mr. Floyd from the prone restraint." In fact, Dunn made a video recreating the final minutes of Floyd's life. His conclusion, "The prone position restraint is not harmful or lethal."
There was, of course, evidence of methamphetamine and opiates in Floyd's system but not enough to kill. Floyd was a user. He had acclimated to fentanyl. There was compelling evidence, however, "that Mr. Floyd had three-vessel coronary artery disease of the heart" as well as an "enlarged heart from high blood pressure." The methamphetamine use increased the risk of Floyd having a sudden heartbeat regularity problem. "Mr. Floyd was upset and anxious," concludes Dunn. By resisting arrest, he set himself up for "sudden death from cardiac arrest, a sudden heart stoppage."
Chauvin Did Not Murder George Floyd - The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
Wednesday, December 18, 2024
RFK Jr. making case to Senators as polio vaccine questions linger
Tuesday, December 17, 2024
Monday, December 16, 2024
Best of: Blizzards
The Truth About The Mystery Drones
FBI informants present on January 6??
Sunday, December 15, 2024
Jordan Peterson: The Rationalists and Empiricists Have Lost
Saturday, December 14, 2024
Wednesday, December 11, 2024
You Are Not Evil
0 seconds ago
Hank,
The data shows the temperature has taken 140 years to go up 1 degree Celsius.
This is relative to a dangerous and deadly cold period in the 1880's.
This slow rate of change shows that there is no climate emergency.
The current rate of change is at most 0.2 degrees per decade.
We will be running out of most fossil fuels by the year 2100.
Coal will be the last fossil fuel to go.
At the current level of usage, we only have 40 years of oil reserves remaining.
CO2 is a valuable resource.
It keeps the earth from freezing and it is plant food.
There is a greening of the earth because of it.
The CO2 level over the last 40 million years has been in a nose dive.
This is because calcifying marine organisms sequester CO2 (indirectly).
The CO2 level got so low during the last period of mass glaciation that it
reached 180 parts per million.
This is just barely above the 150 parts per million where all the terrestrial
plants die.
A funny thing happens to the climate roughly every 100,000 years.
The data shows that the temperature will quickly shoot up 8 to 15 degrees,
level off for 10,000 years, and then go back down almost as quickly.
Then we get 85 to 90 thousand years of mass glaciation where New York is covered
by ice.
We should already be in the cool-down cycle of the interglacial.
The only thing that has prevented the planet from cooling is those pesky humans
who added 150 parts per million CO2 into the atmosphere.
The infrared absorption range of CO2 is much narrower than other gasses like
water vapor, and it has already reached 90% of its absorption capacity.
Climate alarmism is dependent on as-of-yet unproven positive feedback models.
There are many feedbacks, some of which are negative.
There is much controversy over clouds, where common sense would indicate
negative feedback to temperature, but the IPCC says the opposite.
True science looks at data and then comes to a conclusion.
The IPCC does the opposite. They start with a conclusion and then support
that with evidence. The IPCC refused to hire anyone who did not already
believe in catastrophic man-made warming. This shows their bias. The IPCC
actively suppressed skeptical papers and tried to get skeptical scientists
fired. The head of U.N., António Guterres, was a Socialist Party politician
in Portugal, and he routinely makes outrageous statements about the climate
that are completely inaccurate.
Socialism is not palatable to the American people, so the socialists have been
pushing false crises to divide and conquer and to give us more government
control in incremental steps. I'm sorry that you have been duped by this mass
hysteria.
Best wishes,
John Coffey
Tuesday, December 10, 2024
Monday, December 9, 2024
Election 2028
The democratic "bench" is empty while the republicans' is full. Where will the Democratic Party find a presidential candidate who can defeat the republicans in 2028? I just can't find anyone for them at the moment.
Friday, December 6, 2024
Thursday, December 5, 2024
Sunday, December 1, 2024
Saturday, November 30, 2024
Friday, November 29, 2024
Wednesday, November 27, 2024
You Don’t Need Studies to Know “Gender-Affirming Care” Is Evil
Tuesday, November 26, 2024
Monday, November 25, 2024
Sunday, November 24, 2024
Saturday, November 23, 2024
Friday, November 22, 2024
Thursday, November 21, 2024
We Are Still at War
Who is Brian Lozenski? He is a national leader in the CRT movement, the foremost authority on CRT in Minnesota and, most significantly, Tim Walz's most important education advisor. Lozenski is not on the fringes of Walz's administration but at its very center. Lozenski was the de facto leader of Walz's so-called "ethnic studies" curriculum ("ethnic studies" is, in effect, a new name for CRT), which is at the heart of Walz's education program.
Walz has been working diligently for years to embed ethnic studies in the curricula of all grades...
Under the new ethnic studies standards, Kersten reports, first-graders must "identify examples of ethnicity, equality, liberation and systems of power" and "use those examples to construct meanings for those terms." Fourth-graders must "examine how discrimination and the oppression of various racial and ethnic groups have produced resistance movements." High school students are taught to view themselves as members of "racialized hierarchies" based on "dominant European beauty standards." However "jargony," it is clear enough that these standards are intended to lead students to disdain America and join in the overthrow of their country.
If Lozenski is a revolutionary, and he incontestably is, then so is Walz. Walz was a very weak candidate. Moreover, he was to the Left of Harris — exactly what Harris, who was trying to tack to the center, did not need. But, odd as it may sound, Walz was chosen as Harris's running mate, not because he was the most likely to help her win — he clearly wasn't — but because he was the most ideologically compatible with her and the machine that ran her. It actually is not so odd if we keep in mind that the destructive Left, like all revolutionaries, is more concerned with maintaining ideological purity than winning. Likewise, Harris, who was far from the strongest Democrat, was also chosen because her views were most compatible with the revolutionary views of the machine that selected her.
What do we make of the fact that Harris chose as her running mate a man who wants to overthrow America? Could it be that she didn't know whom she was choosing? No, it couldn't be. She, and/or the machine that ran her, knows perfectly well Walz wants to overthrow America.'
Wednesday, November 20, 2024
The COLLAPSE Of The Elitists
Tuesday, November 19, 2024
The New Nuclear Age is Coming
This is all good if you want to live in a dictatorship. Were the regulations passed by Congress? How about the free market deciding which energy to use?
Most fossil fuels will run out by the year 2100. Coal will be the last fossil fuel to run out, and it is very likely that we will need it.
Sunday, November 17, 2024
Eight year old Facebook post
I once took a personality test that claimed that I had 70% left brain dominance. This was in no way a surprise. I am into science, history, math and chess.
I see many assertions on here and elsewhere that seem to me to not have a sound logical basis. This is especially true of political posts in the last few weeks. I find myself reacting to things that seem totally outrageous, but reacting to these things is mostly a waste of my time. It can be entertaining, but it doesn't lead anywhere because I am never going to convince people who are already firm in their beliefs.
I have come to believe that a great many people and I will never agree on great many things because our brains are wired differently. This doesn't necessarily make one person right and the other wrong, but it does mean that we see the world very differently.
I think that politics is driven by fear. Each side has completely different things that they are afraid of. Fear is an extremely powerful motivator, therefore it takes away people's ability to be objective. Politics is mostly a reaction to things that people are against, because if people were perfectly happy, they wouldn't need politics.
Best wishes,
John Coffey
Friday, November 15, 2024
College and politics
Wednesday, November 13, 2024
Tuesday, November 12, 2024
Monday, November 11, 2024
Sunday, November 10, 2024
Saturday, November 9, 2024
Where Does the Money Go?
Friday, November 8, 2024
Thursday, November 7, 2024
Wednesday, November 6, 2024
The Electoral College Is Vital To Our Republic
'Like a phoenix rising from the ashes'
Tuesday, November 5, 2024
The Man Who Invented A Single Weapon To Destroy The World
Monday, November 4, 2024
Sunday, November 3, 2024
Origin of Hitler and the Nazi Party | Rick Spence
Saturday, November 2, 2024
Friday, November 1, 2024
How Harris or Trump could win 270 electoral votes
Did Donald Trump say that he wanted to imprison dissenters?
"I will appoint a real special prosecutor to go after the most corrupt president in the history of America, Joe Biden, and go after the Biden crime family," Trump said in June at his Bedminster, New Jersey, residence, just hours after being arraigned at a federal courthouse in Miami on charges related to his handling of classified documents after he left the White House.
Trump also discussed his 2016 opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton, and how he did not imprison her. "Lock her up" was a frequent chant at Trump's campaign rallies — often fueled by Trump himself — during that election cycle.
But Trump credited himself for not going after Clinton, compared to what is now being done to him.
"Some people said I should have done it, but, you know, could have, would have been very easy to do it, but I thought it would be a terrible precedent for our country," Trump said. "And now, whoever it may be, you're going to have to view it very much differently. This is a bad, bad road that they're leading us down to as a country."
In a statement, Biden campaign spokesperson James Singer said that Trump's comments are "just the latest proof that he will do anything to regain power, preserve his own freedom and seek revenge on anyone who opposes him."
Thursday, October 31, 2024
Time Is Now for Cigarette Tax Increase - Indiana Chamber of Commerce
Wednesday, October 30, 2024
Something on my mind… (Dick Van Dyke)
'Van Dyke endorsed Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democratic Party presidential primaries. In July 2016, while campaigning for Sanders, Van Dyke said of Donald Trump, "I haven't been this scared since the Cuban Missile Crisis.'
Tuesday, October 29, 2024
Possible end of the American experiment
'On November 5, the American experiment in republican government may well come to an end. Over the past two decades we have been living through a slow-motion Communist revolution. Acts of political warfare have become commonplace. The most devastating has been the corruption of our election system.
Having vilified President Trump more than any man in American history, the American Communists and their allies in the Democratic Party (and the Communist world abroad) may well be able to steal the 2024 election. One thing needs to be made clear: if this happens, they will have created an ungovernable country.
I have two kinds of colleagues: those who believe it is going to be a wave election and therefore a blowout for President Trump, and those who believe the election can be stolen given the massive cyber-vulnerability of our electronic voting system, and the refusal of blue state governors and secretaries of state to build a transparent, same-day voting system. At this stage of the game, I believe it will be a blowout win for President Trump. But I realize that it may well be stolen for reasons I describe in my American Mind essay, "The Diminishing Likelihood of a Fair Election."
The RealClearPolitics average of polls has Donald Trump either up or tied in the seven swing states. There are very few if any undecided voters at this point. In these polls, President Trump has historically, as the pollsters say, "underperformed." This means that a two-point lead by President Trump is likely a four- or five-point lead. Perhaps more telling are the right track/wrong track polls that ask Americans whether or not the country is headed in the right direction. As of October 23, only 27% of the American people believe the country is on the right track.
This is historically low. Never has an incumbent vice president won an election for president with these numbers. That 27% is obviously the Democratic base: hard-core progressives, Communists, abortionists, and transgenderists. Only they could believe the country is on the right track. Simple math would suggest that even much of the traditional Democratic base believes the country is not going in ways that are conducive to the happiness and welfare of the American people.
Yes, but we are told that Donald Trump is a racist, sexist beast virtually indistinguishable from Adolf Hitler. How can this man win?
Here let me make two points. First: this caricature, however effective it may have been in 2016 and 2020, has lost its effectiveness in 2024. The first Trump Administration was not an exercise in the exploitation of blacks, Hispanics, and other minorities. It ushered in economic good times for these groups, who enjoyed greater prosperity and freedom than at any other time in the history of the United States. Their lived experience demonstrated to them that President Trump saw them not as a problem, but rather as an integral part of American society and economic life. Charges of racism, ridiculous on their face, have grown meaningless to everyday Americans.
Then there is the matter of Kamala Harris.
Harris was an obscure vice president, previously unpopular even among the Democratic base. Her public performances are nothing short of bizarre, ranging from frenetic to what can only be described as addled, probably by drugs or alcohol.
She is not, in short, running a credible campaign. Even within left-wing popular culture, she comes off as little more than a joke. Is there anyone who believes that, if President Biden had dropped out of the race last year and there had been a competitive primary season, Kamala Harris would today be the nominee of the Democratic Party? She would have likely done little better than she did in 2020. The country is quite alive to this fact.
So the question "What if Kamala wins?" must be answered in light of the fact that she ought not to win by any conventional understanding of polls and public opinion.
That having been said, will Harris win? There are a substantial number of serious people who believe the 2024 election can indeed be stolen. Very little has changed in the seven swing states that decided the 2020 election. If anything remains obvious, it is that there are substantial numbers of Deep State operatives within the Biden Administration who know that if President Trump is elected, they will most certainly face investigation—and for those who have committed crimes, prosecution.
The accusation that a second Trump administration would more broadly investigate journalists, and purveyors of popular broadcast media, is of course absurd. To the contrary, President Trump would enjoy their collective misery as they watched him Make America Great Again.
But there are people within the Intelligence Community and the Department of Justice who crossed all manner of lines in their treatment of President Trump and his allies such as Steve Bannon (yet to be released from jail). Likewise, the Secret Service's failures to protect President Trump this summer constitute an astonishing stain upon this republic.
So there are large numbers of powerful people within our government who have a vested interest in seeing President Trump lose. For all of FBI Director Christopher Wray's warnings of Russian and Chinese influence operations in the election, one doubts that a finger will be lifted to stop either country, or their surrogates within the drug cartels and dark money groups, from working to alter the results of the election.
Clearly our American oligarchs on Wall Street, Hollywood, and Silicon Valley have decided that Kamala Harris is not their cup of tea—witness the fact that the Los Angeles Times did not endorse Kamala Harris. But they may not have a say if nation-state actors or dark money groups genuinely want President Trump defeated. Our system is not designed to stop determined adversaries of a free and fair election.
So, if Kamala Harris does win, it will, as of today, be because of a stolen election. Under these circumstances, America will become an ungovernable country. Large groups of Americans will believe their vote no longer counts. We have the experience this summer of Venezuela, where it was clear the opposition party won—so said the Biden Administration—only to have the Maduro regime keep hold of power by affirming the fraudulent results and gutting it out publicly against domestic and world opinion. One imagines the Harris campaign learned a lesson from that.'
https://americanmind.org/salvo/what-if-harris-gets-away-with-it/
Monday, October 28, 2024
Sunday, October 27, 2024
Saturday, October 26, 2024
Wednesday, October 23, 2024
Tuesday, October 22, 2024
Monday, October 21, 2024
Sunday, October 20, 2024
We Asked 100 Wisconsinites Who They’re Voting For
Trump Serves Customers At McDonald's Drive-Through In Pennsylvania
Saturday, October 19, 2024
Friday, October 18, 2024
The Hershey's Kisses Rate of Inflation
Today, the packages of Hershey's Kisses at Walmart vary slightly in price depending on the size, but they average about $8 per pound. So the average price of a Hershey's Kiss is 8 cents each. (Each Hershey's Kiss weighs 4.5 grams or roughly 1/100th of a pound.)
This makes the Hershey's Kiss rate of inflation over 55 years 1600%. During the same period, the official rate of inflation, which I always find suspect, is 850%. Either the official rate is wrong, or Hershey's Kisses rose faster than inflation.
--
Best wishes,
John Coffey
http://www.entertainmentjourney.com
55% increase total violent crime over 3 years
The increases shown by the NCVS during the Biden-Harris administration are by far the largest percentage increases over any three years, slightly more than doubling the previous record.